Could we play our own Trump card?

US President Donald Trump rose to power largely on the back of shallow slogans and thin policies: could we see a similar ascension here? Image: Business Insider.

By Tom Waterwheel*

Australians seem to view the rise of Trumpist populism with bemusement and alarm.

The daily trainwreck of Donald Trump and his advisors keeps the political junky on high alert.  As if the Trump Bull-in-a-China Shop was not entertaining enough, we now have puppet master Steve Bannon, the anti-intellectualist Sean Spicer and Dial-a-fact Kellyanne Conway sharing the burden of spreading hate, pseudo facts and fear around the globe.

Trump is no lone ranger.  For the price of one, the US, and by extension the world, got Trump and his posse of war-mongering deadbeats, who now occupy the White House because of the collective brain-out of 63 million Americans.  Most may by now regret this, but the race was run and won on November 8, 2016 and on that day, too many Americans put number one next to the man who unashamedly campaigned on lies, sexism, racism, war-mongering and plain dumb economics.

The question is: could it happen here?

Trump tapped into a nationwide attention deficit disorder.  For whatever reason the punters en masse didn’t take the effort to read politics beyond a 140 character tweet.  Those of us left bewildered by what we have seen blame Facebook, Twitter, I’m a Celebrity get me out of here, the media etc..

None of that matters.  Trump and Clinton faced an increasing number of voters who do not do policies.  Instead, they want solutions, quick, easy and on a plate; and on that front Trump was their man.

Where Clinton had thoughtful and considered responses to the challenges facing the USA, Trump had solutions and a little abuse thrown in, 140-characters-or-less.  Few of which made sense.  But at least Joe Punter heard the solution with little effort. (And he is still at it).

In Australia, we have seen politicians tread down this same path.  The 2013 election where Tony Abbott prevailed, was characterised by fear politics.

On the specific policy issues of asylum seekers and climate change, Abbott blazed a trail that Trump made a highway.  Whenever a microphone is close, these ‘leaders’ simply repeated the mantra that progressive policies on asylum seekers and climate change will take jobs away from middle Australia/America.

Trump and Abbott on asylum seekers: “stop the boats”, “build a wall”, “stop the boats”, “build a wall”.

Trump and Abbott on climate change: “great big tax”, “Chinese conspiracy”,  “great big tax”, “Chinese conspiracy”.

Abbott handed the baton to his neo-conservative colleagues across the Pacific, and run with it they did.

But as we witnessed, Abbott’s ill-considered neo-con policies did not wash with everyone in his party and his stay at the Lodge was cut short.  Perhaps Trump’s stay will be short too, however the US political system does not work as does ours, with leaders not so disposable.

Like a phoenix rising from the ashes, Pauline Hanson’s political career has been resurrected. Image: Alchetron.

Our own redhead, Pauline Hanson, is our closest version of Trump and it is when we look to her appeal and increasing popularity that we see Trumpism alive and well in Australia.

What is telling about the Hanson effect, is that she, like Trump, appeals to a scattering of the disaffected across the political spectrum from the far right to the traditional working class left.  She, like Trump, speaks to their frustrations, often to their yearning of the old days, when unskilled jobs were seemingly abundant and Australia was by and large a white, Christian society.

Fear is one of our greatest motivators and Pauline does fear well.  Furthermore, times are tough for many, and as the USA has experienced over the last decade, the winds of global competition can be unforgiving, and we in Australia are now starting to feel its effects.

In a connected world where capital moves freely across the globe, old stable economies such as Australia, have much to lose.  To deal with the acceleration of change, be it capital inflows and outflows, refugees, climate change and so on, requires intelligent, considered responses.

We have seen little of such, indeed the short-term opinion poll obsession of our major political parties suggests the established political class are more focused on short-term survival over long-term intellectual policy, leaving the door ajar for the Prophets of Doom.

So here we are, mid 2017.  The UK has lurched towards nationalism in an increasingly global world; the USA has fallen for anti-intellectualism in an ever more complex and sophisticated world; and the French, as did the Dutch, looked closely at following the far-right option.

This at a time when more than ever refugees are escaping poverty, war and political and religious persecution.

When unemployment goes up, so does the appeal of neo-conservative approaches to climate change and asylum seekers. Image: FrumForum.

As it stands, one important ingredient is missing in Australia to cook up a Trump Stew: high and long-term unemployment.

Australia’s unemployment rate is 5.9%.  Australia is yet to swallow the bitter medicine of a changing world economy where jobs are replaced by robots, computers and machines and unskilled labour exported off shore.

Rest assured, however, it is coming and recent history demonstrates that Australian politicians offer little in the way of long term policies to enable Australia to adapt to an ever changing world.   If Australia’s economic fortunes nose dive and unemployment tilts up, a reactionary politician may be the sole beneficiary.

Our seat of Wannon doesn’t follow national trends: its voters are unquestionably loyal to the conservatives.  Wannon will go where the Liberals take them.  If Canberra judges a hard right Trumpist is needed to lead the Coalition, then of course they could expect to count on the vote of the Wannon constituents to support them.

Having witnessed Trump in full flight, would we be wise enough to stand up and say no?

* Tom Waterwheel is the pseudonym of a local political observer and agitator who, because of the constraints of his day job, cannot write publicly under his own name. 

 

3 thoughts on “Could we play our own Trump card?”

  1. Interesting food for thought Tom. But I do not believe the current species of right wing populist politicians just evolved from the primordial soup of underemployment, disconnection and racism. I believe them to be the Frankenstein’s Monster created out of the conservative, rich, white, industrialist laboratories of the ironically named Institute of Public Affairs, the IPA. The early tinkerings of this “think tank” could be seen in the now infamous meeting of John Howard and fossil fuel industry representatives which discussed the question of how they could effectively suppress the development of renewable energy technology. And funded by Koch Industries, in the US, the IPA has been tasked with funding and influencing right wing politics in Australia and the US ever since. Xenophobia, anti immigration, anti refugee and blatant racism are the lures used to gain the votes of the disenfranchised unskilled worker. But the real end game of the modern conservative is fossil fuel wealth. The Abbotts, Turnbulls, Trumps and Hansons of this world did not emerge like the trilobite from the murky depths but rather were created by a group which make JR Ewing look like a philanthropist.

    1. I agree Edward. The factors you mention are all in place which then allow a nutcase such as Trump to surface. Then, however, the other machinations kick in which get him enough votes to be the man. As for Wannon, we are unwaveringly loyal to whoever the Liberal Party dish up.

  2. Great article Tom. For my money, we’ve bottomed out as far our flirtation with Trumpist-like populism goes and I reckon we got off light with Abbott and Hanson. The Libs got a real fright after the last election, the Abbott/Hockey “Gold Standard” 2014 budget gave everyone a real insight into the priorities of the modern Liberal Party. And if you happen to be a wage/salary earning, mortgage paying, couple of kids at school type punter, you’re not their priority. As a result a suspicious electorate and a resurgent Labor Party boxed them into policies they didn’t want to pursue such as Gonski-lite and a barely thawed Medicare rebate unfreeze. The electorate can keep the bastards honest but it takes voices and awareness. Get Up are a great example of making this happen. As for Wannon, it’s a slow ol’ wheel. Nonetheless, there’s a generation of voters that are gaining awareness and finding their voice on issues ranging from education to marriage equality and the environment that are ready for change. And my party, the Labor Party, needs to make sure that they are giving them the chance to have a voice.

Comments are closed.